Is Singapore’s purchase of F-35s targeted at China?


Trade and commercial disputes have consistently caused disruptions in China-U.S. relations in recent years, but geopolitical rivalry in the South China Sea is another bone of contention between the two big powers that’s never far from the surface.

On March 1, the issue came to the fore after Singapore’s defense minister Dr Ng Eng Hen announced in Parliament that the country plans to buy up to 12 F-35 stealth jets from the U.S.

Speculation soon followed that such a move is “indicative of growing concerns within Asia regarding China’s regional ambitions,” with an article on CNN hinting at Singapore’s fear of China’s “aggressiveness” in the South China Sea. The article also suggested that a deal would further deepen the divide between Beijing and Washington.

A Martin F-35B fighter jet on display during the Singapore Airshow at Changi Exhibition Centre, February 7, 2018, in Singapore. /VCG Photo

However, such a claim is simply a reflection of a common tendency by some to overplay China’s security threat and to try to link every change in Southeast Asia security situation with China-U.S. rivalry. Regarding the Singapore purchase, Chinese experts dispute the claim that it is targeted at China or is associated with the South China Sea issue.

They point out that Singapore is not one of the disputing parties in the territorial disputes regarding the South China Sea, which mainly involve Brunei, China, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam. According to Cheng Hanping, senior researcher at the Collaborative Innovation Center of South China Sea Studies, it is a far-fetched idea that this major weapon procurement is a reaction to China’s handling of the issue.

Instead, the decision should be examined in the broader context of the country’s defense policy, experts advised. As a city-state that has a territory of only 721.5 kmĀ² and a population of 5 million people, Singapore actively seeks to build a robust national defense with “its policy placing ‘self-defense’ at the core,” or “deterrence and diplomacy” in the official wording, according to Tang Qifang, an associate research fellow at the China Institute of International Studies.

Its turbulent relations with its neighbors in the past, most notably Malaysia with which Singapore has frequently squabbled over maritime and airspace disputes since its separation from the former in 1965, also weighs heavily in its defense strategy. Therefore, “If anything, this move is more likely to be seen as a deterrence to Malaysia, rather than defiance of China,” said Cheng.

Moreover, Singapore’s close relationship with the U.S. is nothing new. Traditionally it has been in a strong military alliance with America and hosts one of its overseas navy facilities, even though it has been careful enough not to openly label the relationship as one of allies. Given its lack of land to train troops, Singapore has had to resort to acquiring high-end military weapons, with the U.S as the main supplier. Experts believe that buying F-35s is consistent with the strategy and there is no need to read too much into the decision.